Sub-national · edition 2021

Ghana - Sekondi-Takoradi 2021: strong rules, weak disclosure

Ghana - Sekondi-Takoradi's strongest dimension is enabling environment; its weakest is data publication. The framework is not yet translating evenly into practice.

93 indicators 15 procuring entities 4 dimensions

Overall ITI score

21.6/100

Global average: 44.2

First edition

The ITI score

Ghana - Sekondi-Takoradi enters the index at 21.6 of 100

22.6 points below the global average. Enabling environment carries the score; data publication holds it back.

The 2021 baseline
21.62021
View as table
EditionOverall ITI score
202121.6
Score by dimension, 2021
Enabling environment60.9
Capacities and processes16.2
Citizen participation20.4
Data publication3.7

Dashed marks show the global average.

Inside the four dimensions

Where the score comes from

1

Enabling environment

60.9/100

Strongest area:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +3 more100

Weakest area:Infrastructure data disclosure standard · Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standard +1 more0

Explore 3 sub-areas
1.1Legal framework and digital tools60.9
1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework90
1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector52
1.1.3National digital information tools42
2

Capacities and processes

16.2/100

Strongest area:Computer equipment30.7

Weakest area:Disclosure training programme6

Explore 5 sub-areas
2.1Institutional capacities20.1
2.1.1Basic knowledge18.3
2.1.2Digital capacities21.9
2.2Institutional processes13.6
2.2.1Procedures to disclose information15.5
2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information12.4
2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure12.7
3

Citizen participation

20.4/100

Strongest area:Permanent and inclusive citizen participation30.7

Weakest area:Online form for consultation or requests10

Explore 2 sub-areas
3.1Participation practices20.4
3.1.1Participation opportunities24.3
3.1.2Use of information by citizens17.2
4

Data publication

3.7/100

Strongest area:Project location35

Weakest area:Environmental impact · Land and settlement impact +20 more0

Explore 6 sub-areas
4.1Disclosure practices3.7
4.1.1Project identification17.3
4.1.2Project preparation3.3
4.1.3Execution contract procurement3.4
4.1.4Supervision contract procurement2.2
4.1.5Execution contract implementation0
4.1.6Supervision contract implementation0
Full detail The complete 93-indicator breakdown
National ITI ScoreScore21.6
1Enabling environmentDimension60.9
1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable60.9
1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSub-variable90
1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicator100
1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicator100
1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicator100
1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicator60
1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSub-variable52
1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicator100
1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicator100
1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator0
1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicator60
1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator0
1.1.3National digital information toolsSub-variable42
1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicator60
1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicator60
1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicator0
2Capacities and processesDimension16.2
2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable20.1
2.1.1Basic knowledgeSub-variable18.3
2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicator16.7
2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicator18.7
2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicator18
2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicator10
2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicator28
2.1.2Digital capacitiesSub-variable21.9
2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicator30.7
2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicator14.7
2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicator28
2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicator18
2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicator18.7
2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicator20
2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicator16
2.2Institutional processesVariable13.6
2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSub-variable15.5
2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicator8
2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicator10
2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicator16
2.2.1.4Information officerIndicator17.3
2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicator26
2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSub-variable12.4
2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicator14
2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicator6
2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicator19.3
2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicator8.7
2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicator21.3
2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicator6.7
2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSub-variable12.7
2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator13.3
2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator12
3Citizen participationDimension20.4
3.1Participation practicesVariable20.4
3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSub-variable24.3
3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicator27.3
3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicator30.7
3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicator24
3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicator22.7
3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicator10
3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicator26.7
3.1.2Use of information by citizensSub-variable17.2
3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicator13.3
3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicator22
3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicator14.7
3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicator17.3
3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicator18
3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicator17.3
3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicator18
4Information disclosureDimension3.7
4.1Disclosure practicesVariable3.7
4.1.1Project identificationSub-variable17.3
4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicator8.3
4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicator28.3
4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicator16
4.1.1.4Project nameIndicator22
4.1.1.5Project locationIndicator35
4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicator12.3
4.1.1.7PurposeIndicator9
4.1.2Project preparationSub-variable3.3
4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicator0
4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicator0
4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicator7.3
4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicator4.7
4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicator16.7
4.1.3Execution contract procurementSub-variable3.4
4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator11
4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicator8.3
4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicator0
4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicator0
4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicator0
4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicator3.3
4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicator1.7
4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicator5
4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicator4
4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicator1
4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSub-variable2.2
4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator10.3
4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicator1.7
4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicator0
4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicator0
4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicator0
4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicator0
4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicator0
4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicator5
4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicator1.7
4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicator3
4.1.5Execution contract implementationSub-variable0
4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0
4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0
4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0
4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicator0
4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0
4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0
4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSub-variable0
4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0
4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0
4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0
4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicator0
4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0
4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0

Compare this country with others

See it side by side with any other result, or download the underlying data.

Country Comparison View Trends Open Data Portal