Sub-national · edition 2023

Indonesia - West Lombok 2023: strong rules, weak public use

Indonesia - West Lombok's strongest dimension is enabling environment; its weakest is citizen participation. The framework is not yet translating evenly into practice.

93 indicators 17 procuring entities 4 dimensions

Overall ITI score

31.4/100

Global average: 44.2

First edition

The ITI score

Indonesia - West Lombok enters the index at 31.4 of 100

12.8 points below the global average. Enabling environment carries the score; citizen participation holds it back.

The 2023 baseline

31.42023

View as table

Edition	Overall ITI score
2023	31.4

Score by dimension, 2023

Enabling environment59.7

Capacities and processes31.4

Citizen participation10.4

Data publication27.2

Dashed marks show the global average.

Inside the four dimensions

Where the score comes from

Enabling environment

59.7/100

Strongest area:Access-to-public information law · Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandates100

Weakest area:Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platform0

Explore 3 sub-areas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools59.7

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework85

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector48

1.1.3National digital information tools50

Capacities and processes

31.4/100

Strongest area:Institutional website71.8

Weakest area:Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing information0

Explore 5 sub-areas

2.1Institutional capacities42.4

2.1.1Basic knowledge26.4

2.1.2Digital capacities58.5

2.2Institutional processes24

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information23.8

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information22.1

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure26.5

Citizen participation

10.4/100

Strongest area:Awareness of participation opportunities28.2

Weakest area:Citizens use evidence · Improvements as a response to citizen participation0

Explore 2 sub-areas

3.1Participation practices10.4

3.1.1Participation opportunities19.2

3.1.2Use of information by citizens3.2

Data publication

27.2/100

Strongest area:Project owner · Project location +3 more100

Weakest area:Purpose · Environmental impact +23 more0

Explore 6 sub-areas

4.1Disclosure practices27.2

4.1.1Project identification44.4

4.1.2Project preparation24.8

4.1.3Execution contract procurement58.9

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement7.1

4.1.5Execution contract implementation0

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation0

Procuring entities

How 17 procuring entities compare

Scores run from 31.7 to 15.4, with a median of 25.1.

0Leading80 to 100

0Strong60 to 79

0Developing40 to 59

17Weak0 to 39

#
1	Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Lombok Barat	31.7	38.2	35.3	23.8
2	Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Kabupaten Lombok Barat	30.6	51.8	9	25.6
3	Dinas Perindustrian Dan Perdagangan Kabupaten Lombok Barat	29.7	43.6	19.8	23.8
4	Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Lombok Barat	29.5	45.4	9.9	28
5	Dinas Pertanian Lombok Barat	29.4	38.7	14.4	30.8
6	Badan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Lombok Barat	28.2	30.2	25.8	28
7	Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD)	26.9	44.9	0	28
8	Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kabupaten Lombok Barat	25.3	32.8	5.4	31.1
9	Dinas Pemuda Dan Olahraga	25.1	28.5	15.9	28
10	Dinas Kesehatan Lombok Barat	24.4	32.3	5.1	29.6
11	Dinas Pariwisata Lombok Barat	23.3	24.7	9	31.1
12	Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang - Cipta Karya	20.8	21.9	11.7	25.6
13	Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Lombok Barat	20	25.4	6.3	23.8
14	Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang - Bina Marga	18.9	23.8	0	26.3
15	Dinas Perumahan Dan Pemukiman Kabupaten Lombok Barat	18.8	19.4	9.9	23.8
16	Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang - Sumber Daya Air	18	19.6	0	28
17	Dinas Koperasi Dan Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah	15.4	12.2	0	28

Entity dashboard

Inspect one entity in depth

Choose an entity

Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Lombok Barat

Ranked #1 of 17 entities

31.7PE ITI score

Capacities and processes6.8 above average38.2

Citizen participation24.9 above average35.3

Information disclosure3.4 below average23.8

Ticks mark the average across all 17 entities.

Full detail The complete 93-indicator breakdown

National ITI ScoreScore31.4

1Enabling environmentDimension59.7

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable59.7

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSub-variable85

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicator100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicator80

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicator100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicator60

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSub-variable48

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicator40

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicator40

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator40

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicator60

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator60

1.1.3National digital information toolsSub-variable50

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicator60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicator80

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicator0

2Capacities and processesDimension31.4

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable42.4

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSub-variable26.4

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicator29.4

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicator24.7

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicator11.8

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicator9.4

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicator56.5

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSub-variable58.5

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicator64.7

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicator70.6

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicator71.8

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicator49.4

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicator56.5

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicator61.2

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicator3.5

2.2Institutional processesVariable24

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSub-variable23.8

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicator45.9

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicator16.5

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicator14.1

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicator16.5

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicator25.9

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSub-variable22.1

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicator40

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicator35.3

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicator27.1

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicator0

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicator3.5

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicator16.5

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSub-variable26.5

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator27.1

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator25.9

3Citizen participationDimension10.4

3.1Participation practicesVariable10.4

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSub-variable19.2

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicator22.4

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicator18.8

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicator18.8

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicator10.6

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicator9.4

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicator28.2

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSub-variable3.2

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicator9.4

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicator7.1

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicator4.7

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicator2.4

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicator0

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicator3.5

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicator0

4Information disclosureDimension27.2

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable27.2

4.1.1Project identificationSub-variable44.4

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicator74.1

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicator100

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicator21.2

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicator61.8

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicator100

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicator28.2

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicator0

4.1.2Project preparationSub-variable24.8

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicator0

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicator0

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicator0

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicator74.1

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicator100

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSub-variable58.9

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator67.6

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicator73.5

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicator100

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicator100

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicator0

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicator97.1

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicator61.8

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicator26.5

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicator58.8

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicator3.5

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSub-variable7.1

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator0

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicator35.3

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicator35.3

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicator0

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicator0

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicator0

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicator0

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicator0

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicator0

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicator0

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSub-variable0

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicator0

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSub-variable0

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicator0

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0

Indonesia - West Lombok 2023: strong rules, weak public use

Indonesia - West Lombok enters the index at 31.4 of 100

Where the score comes from

How 17 procuring entities compare

Inspect one entity in depth

Compare this country with others