Sub-national · edition 2026

Nigeria - Kaduna 2026: strong rules, weak disclosure

Nigeria - Kaduna's strongest dimension is enabling environment; its weakest is data publication. The framework is not yet translating evenly into practice.

93 indicators 7 procuring entities 4 dimensions

Overall ITI score

37.5/100

Global average: 44.2

First edition

The ITI score

Nigeria - Kaduna enters the index at 37.5 of 100

6.7 points below the global average. Enabling environment carries the score; data publication holds it back.

The 2026 baseline

37.52026

View as table

Edition	Overall ITI score
2026	37.5

Score by dimension, 2026

Enabling environment57

Capacities and processes53.6

Citizen participation40.8

Data publication13

Dashed marks show the global average.

Inside the four dimensions

Where the score comes from

Enabling environment

57/100

Strongest area:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +2 more100

Weakest area:Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projects · Infrastructure data disclosure standard +2 more0

Explore 3 sub-areas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools57

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector12

1.1.3National digital information tools74

Capacities and processes

53.6/100

Strongest area:Knowledge about different data categories100

Weakest area:Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing information5.7

Explore 5 sub-areas

2.1Institutional capacities61.1

2.1.1Basic knowledge74.3

2.1.2Digital capacities48

2.2Institutional processes48.5

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information61.1

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information45.7

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure37.1

Citizen participation

40.8/100

Strongest area:Permanent and inclusive citizen participation91.4

Weakest area:Citizen attention office · Requests and responses of access to information0

Explore 2 sub-areas

3.1Participation practices40.8

3.1.1Participation opportunities45.4

3.1.2Use of information by citizens37

Data publication

13/100

Strongest area:Project name99.3

Weakest area:Purpose · Environmental impact +23 more0

Explore 6 sub-areas

4.1Disclosure practices13

4.1.1Project identification52.3

4.1.2Project preparation15.2

4.1.3Execution contract procurement16.6

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement0

4.1.5Execution contract implementation3.6

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation0

Procuring entities

How 7 procuring entities compare

Scores run from 45.9 to 22.3, with a median of 39.3.

0Leading80 to 100

0Strong60 to 79

3Developing40 to 59

4Weak0 to 39

#
1	Kaduna State Roads Agency -KADRA	45.9	79.8	55	10.7
2	Kaduna State Facilities Management Agency -KADFAMA	42.8	69.6	47.6	16.4
3	Kaduna State Water Corporation -KADSWAC	40.8	52.6	60.8	18
4	Kaduna State Primary Healthcare Board -KDSPHCB	39.3	69.6	44	9.9
5	Ministry of Public Works and Infrastructure -MPWI	25.3	36.4	29.6	12.9
6	Ministry of Business, Innovation and Technology -MBIT	22.7	33.9	27.9	9.7
7	Ministry of Housing and Urband Development -MHUD	22.3	33.1	20.9	13.7

Entity dashboard

Inspect one entity in depth

Choose an entity

Kaduna State Roads Agency -KADRA

Ranked #1 of 7 entities

45.9PE ITI score

Capacities and processes26.2 above average79.8

Citizen participation14.2 above average55

Information disclosure2.3 below average10.7

Ticks mark the average across all 7 entities.

Full detail The complete 93-indicator breakdown

National ITI ScoreScore37.5

1Enabling environmentDimension57

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable57

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSub-variable100

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicator100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicator100

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicator100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicator100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSub-variable12

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicator60

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicator0

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator0

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicator0

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator0

1.1.3National digital information toolsSub-variable74

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicator80

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicator80

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicator60

2Capacities and processesDimension53.6

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable61.1

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSub-variable74.3

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicator80

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicator94.3

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicator65.7

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicator31.4

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicator100

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSub-variable48

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicator74.3

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicator25.7

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicator22.9

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicator45.7

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicator88.6

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicator48.6

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicator51.4

2.2Institutional processesVariable48.5

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSub-variable61.1

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicator28.6

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicator42.9

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicator74.3

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicator94.3

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicator65.7

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSub-variable45.7

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicator48.6

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicator34.3

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicator94.3

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicator5.7

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicator60

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicator34.3

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSub-variable37.1

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator34.3

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator40

3Citizen participationDimension40.8

3.1Participation practicesVariable40.8

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSub-variable45.4

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicator40

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicator91.4

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicator40

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicator0

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicator57.1

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicator62.9

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSub-variable37

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicator25.7

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicator0

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicator28.6

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicator34.3

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicator80

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicator14.3

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicator54.3

4Information disclosureDimension13

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable13

4.1.1Project identificationSub-variable52.3

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicator98.6

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicator85.7

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicator60

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicator99.3

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicator95.7

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicator34.3

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicator0

4.1.2Project preparationSub-variable15.2

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicator0

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicator0

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicator0

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicator60

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicator32.1

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSub-variable16.6

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator45

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicator0

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicator0

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicator35.7

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicator17.9

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicator6.4

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicator0

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicator60.7

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicator0

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicator0

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSub-variable0

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator0

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicator0

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicator0

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicator0

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicator0

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicator0

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicator0

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicator0

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicator0

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicator0

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSub-variable3.6

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicator3.6

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicator3.6

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicator3.6

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicator3.6

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator3.6

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator3.6

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSub-variable0

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicator0

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0

Nigeria - Kaduna 2026: strong rules, weak disclosure

Nigeria - Kaduna enters the index at 37.5 of 100

Where the score comes from

How 7 procuring entities compare

Inspect one entity in depth

Compare this country with others