Sub-national · edition 2026

Indonesia - NTB 2026: strong rules, weak disclosure

Indonesia - NTB's strongest dimension is enabling environment; its weakest is data publication. The framework is not yet translating evenly into practice.

93 indicators 19 procuring entities 4 dimensions

Overall ITI score

40.2/100

Global average: 44.2

First edition

The ITI score

Indonesia - NTB enters the index at 40.2 of 100

4 points below the global average. Enabling environment carries the score; data publication holds it back.

The 2026 baseline

40.22026

View as table

Edition	Overall ITI score
2026	40.2

Score by dimension, 2026

Enabling environment56.6

Capacities and processes48.3

Citizen participation31.6

Data publication29.8

Dashed marks show the global average.

Inside the four dimensions

Where the score comes from

Enabling environment

56.6/100

Strongest area:Access-to-public information law · Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandates +1 more100

Weakest area:Infrastructure data disclosure standard · Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open data +1 more0

Explore 3 sub-areas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools56.6

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework80

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector44

1.1.3National digital information tools50

Capacities and processes

48.3/100

Strongest area:Institutional website89.5

Weakest area:Disclosure training programme · Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing information9.5

Explore 5 sub-areas

2.1Institutional capacities57.8

2.1.1Basic knowledge47.2

2.1.2Digital capacities68.4

2.2Institutional processes42

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information61.7

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information28

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure35.3

Citizen participation

31.6/100

Strongest area:Permanent and inclusive citizen participation51.6

Weakest area:Evidence of joint projects0

Explore 2 sub-areas

3.1Participation practices31.6

3.1.1Participation opportunities40.8

3.1.2Use of information by citizens24.1

Data publication

29.8/100

Strongest area:Project reference number · Project owner +4 more100

Weakest area:Sector and sub-sector · Environmental impact +23 more0

Explore 6 sub-areas

4.1Disclosure practices29.8

4.1.1Project identification51.3

4.1.2Project preparation29.2

4.1.3Execution contract procurement67.8

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement0

4.1.5Execution contract implementation0

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation0

Procuring entities

How 19 procuring entities compare

Scores run from 57 to 18.7, with a median of 33.6.

0Leading80 to 100

0Strong60 to 79

7Developing40 to 59

12Weak0 to 39

#
1	Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang (Bidang Bina Marga)	57	72.6	75.9	31.6
2	Rumah Sakit Mandalika	55.4	77.2	67.1	29.1
3	Rumah Sakit Jiwa Mutiara Sukma Provinsi	51.8	71.3	60.8	29.1
4	Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan	51.4	71.1	58.5	29.8
5	Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang (Bidang Sumber Daya Air)	47.8	62.8	57.3	28.9
6	Dinas Pertanian dan Perkebunan	47.2	49.3	69.1	31.8
7	Badan Pengelolaan Pendapatan Daerah	42.4	79.5	11.7	29.1
8	Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan	39.7	59.6	32.2	27.1
9	Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan	39.2	41.9	33	40.7
10	Dinas Perindustrian	33.6	55.5	16.8	24.9
11	Dinas Pemuda dan Olahraga	32.9	45.4	22.1	28.8
12	Dinas Koperasi Usaha Kecil dan Menengah	32.7	39	22.1	33.8
13	Dinas Pariwisata	30.7	35.9	22.1	31.6
14	Dinas Perumahan dan Permukiman	24.8	35.3	3.3	29.1
15	Rumah Sakit H. L. Manambai Abdul Kadir	24.7	29.2	9	30.6
16	Sekretariat Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah	23.8	20.2	20.4	29.1
17	RSUD NTB	23.2	33.1	0	29.1
18	Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan	21	20.6	9.9	28.3
19	Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang (Bidang Cipta Karya)	18.7	18.2	9.6	24.7

Entity dashboard

Inspect one entity in depth

Choose an entity

Dinas Pekerjaan Umum dan Penataan Ruang (Bidang Bina Marga)

Ranked #1 of 19 entities

57PE ITI score

Capacities and processes24.3 above average72.6

Citizen participation44.3 above average75.9

Information disclosure1.8 above average31.6

Ticks mark the average across all 19 entities.

Full detail The complete 93-indicator breakdown

National ITI ScoreScore40.2

1Enabling environmentDimension56.6

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable56.6

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSub-variable80

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicator100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicator80

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicator100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicator40

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSub-variable44

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicator100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicator60

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator0

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicator0

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator60

1.1.3National digital information toolsSub-variable50

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicator60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicator80

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicator0

2Capacities and processesDimension48.3

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable57.8

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSub-variable47.2

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicator63.2

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicator24.2

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicator24.2

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicator55.8

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicator68.4

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSub-variable68.4

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicator69.5

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicator85.3

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicator89.5

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicator63.2

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicator67.4

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicator44.2

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicator21.1

2.2Institutional processesVariable42

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSub-variable61.7

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicator37.9

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicator47.4

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicator66.3

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicator81.1

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicator75.8

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSub-variable28

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicator26.3

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicator9.5

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicator55.8

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicator9.5

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicator44.2

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicator29.5

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSub-variable35.3

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator35.8

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator34.7

3Citizen participationDimension31.6

3.1Participation practicesVariable31.6

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSub-variable40.8

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicator38.9

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicator51.6

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicator31.6

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicator48.4

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicator45.3

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicator41.1

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSub-variable24.1

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicator36.8

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicator30.5

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicator43.2

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicator31.6

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicator25.3

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicator0

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicator11.6

4Information disclosureDimension29.8

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable29.8

4.1.1Project identificationSub-variable51.3

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicator100

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicator100

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicator0

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicator64.9

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicator91.2

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicator31.9

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicator28.9

4.1.2Project preparationSub-variable29.2

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicator0

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicator0

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicator1.6

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicator95.1

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicator100

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSub-variable67.8

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator67.7

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicator98.2

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicator100

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicator100

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicator7

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicator100

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicator87.7

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicator17.5

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicator46.7

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicator52.6

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSub-variable0

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator0

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicator0

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicator0

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicator0

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicator0

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicator0

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicator0

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicator0

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicator0

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicator0

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSub-variable0

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicator0

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSub-variable0

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicator0

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicator0

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicator0

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicator0

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator0

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator0

Indonesia - NTB 2026: strong rules, weak disclosure

Indonesia - NTB enters the index at 40.2 of 100

Where the score comes from

How 19 procuring entities compare

Inspect one entity in depth

Compare this country with others