Europe · edition 2021

Ukraine 2021: strong rules, weak public use

Ukraine's strongest dimension is enabling environment; its weakest is citizen participation. The framework is not yet translating evenly into practice.

93 indicators 30 procuring entities 4 dimensions

Overall ITI score

62.2/100

Global average: 44.2

First edition

The ITI score

Ukraine enters the index at 62.2 of 100

18 points above the global average. Enabling environment carries the score; citizen participation holds it back.

The 2021 baseline

62.22021

View as table

Edition	Overall ITI score
2021	62.2

Score by dimension, 2021

Enabling environment70.2

Capacities and processes64.7

Citizen participation56.6

Data publication59

Dashed marks show the global average.

Inside the four dimensions

Where the score comes from

Enabling environment

70.2/100

Strongest area:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +3 more100

Weakest area:Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standard0

Explore 3 sub-areas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools70.2

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector56

1.1.3National digital information tools60

Capacities and processes

64.7/100

Strongest area:Connectivity to the internet · Follow-up mechanisms on information requests +3 more83.3

Weakest area:Use of digital information systems20

Explore 5 sub-areas

2.1Institutional capacities61.6

2.1.1Basic knowledge60.1

2.1.2Digital capacities63.1

2.2Institutional processes66.7

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information65.1

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information54.1

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure83.3

Citizen participation

56.6/100

Strongest area:Citizen attention office · Institutional response capacity83.3

Weakest area:Online form for consultation or requests38

Explore 2 sub-areas

3.1Participation practices56.6

3.1.1Participation opportunities54.3

3.1.2Use of information by citizens58.4

Data publication

59/100

Strongest area:Project location · Procuring entity and contact details +11 more100

Weakest area:Environmental impact0

Explore 6 sub-areas

4.1Disclosure practices59

4.1.1Project identification46.1

4.1.2Project preparation22.8

4.1.3Execution contract procurement100

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement26.7

4.1.5Execution contract implementation86.8

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation26.3

Procuring entities

How 30 procuring entities compare

Scores run from 83.3 to 18.2, with a median of 69.5.

2Leading80 to 100

18Strong60 to 79

5Developing40 to 59

5Weak0 to 39

#
1	Road Service in Ivano-Frankivsk region	83.3	89.8	75.7	82.5
2	Department of Road Economy, Lviv Regional State Administration	83.1	84.7	87.9	78.7
3	Road Service in Lviv region	76.4	93.5	92.7	51.4
4	Road Service in Rivne region	76	86.2	92.7	56.8
5	Road Service in Khmelnytsky Region	75.8	89.7	88.2	55.9
6	Road Service in Donetsk region	74.2	90.6	84.6	53.3
7	Road Service in Poltava region	74.2	86.2	89.3	54.2
8	Road Service in Kharkiv region	73.5	83.7	84.6	57.7
9	Road Service in Vinnytsia region	73.4	90.6	84.6	51.3
10	Department of Territorial Development, Kherson Regional State Administration	72	72	52.3	84.3
11	Road Service in Kyiv region	70.9	86.5	81.9	50.3
12	Department of Development of Basic Industries, Donetsk Regional State Administration	70.7	75.1	50.1	79.8
13	Department of Education Tiachiv City Council Zakarpatska Oblast	70.3	65.6	65.1	77.8
14	State Enterprise "Financing of Infrastructure Projects"	70	76.2	47.4	78.6
15	Department of ‌regional‌ ‌development‌, Zhytomyr Regional State Administration	69.8	75.5	61.1	70.3
16	Road Service in Kherson region	69.5	87	82.8	45.9
17	State Enterprise "Local Road Service in Vinnytsa region"	67.6	82	74.7	50.5
18	Department of the Capital Construction Ivano-Frankivsk Regional State Administration	62.8	67.4	38.7	73.8
19	Department of Construction and Architecture, Rivne Regional State Administration	60.6	69.7	63.9	50.6
20	State Enterprise "Khmelnitskiy Local Road Service"	60.4	72.7	50.1	56.1
21	State Enterprise "Local Road Service", Odesa region	59.1	69.9	63.3	47.1
22	Department of Capital Construction and Roads, Chernivtsi Regional State Administration	58.1	69.4	57.2	48.8
23	Department of Infrastructure, Capital Construction and Road Operation, Chernivtsi Regional State Administration	51.6	62.9	40.7	48.5
24	State Institution "Local Roads of Kherson Region"	49.5	54.3	49.5	45.3
25	State Enterprise "Khmelnytsky Regional Service Of A Single Customer"	49.1	59.6	38.2	46.8
26	Department of Housing, Communal Services and Construction, Dnipropetrovsk Regional State Administration	31	0	0	77.5
27	Department of Regional Development, Housing and Communal Services, Volyn Regional State Administration	21.8	0	0	54.6
28	Department of Construction, Cherkasy Regional State Administration	20.2	0	0	50.5
29	Department of Regional Development, Kyiv Regional State Administration	18.8	0	0	47
30	State Enterprise "Agency of Local Roads" Kirovohrad region	18.2	0	0	45.5

Entity dashboard

Inspect one entity in depth

Choose an entity

Road Service in Ivano-Frankivsk region

Ranked #1 of 30 entities

83.3PE ITI score

Capacities and processes25.1 above average89.8

Citizen participation19.1 above average75.7

Information disclosure23.5 above average82.5

Ticks mark the average across all 30 entities.

Full detail The complete 93-indicator breakdown

National ITI ScoreScore62.2

1Enabling environmentDimension70.2

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable70.2

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSub-variable100

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicator100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicator100

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicator100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicator100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSub-variable56

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicator100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicator60

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator60

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicator60

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicator0

1.1.3National digital information toolsSub-variable60

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicator60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicator60

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicator60

2Capacities and processesDimension64.7

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable61.6

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSub-variable60.1

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicator77.3

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicator39.3

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicator24

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicator78.7

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicator81.3

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSub-variable63.1

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicator82.7

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicator83.3

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicator64.7

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicator49.3

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicator20

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicator30.7

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicator70

2.2Institutional processesVariable66.7

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSub-variable65.1

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicator57.3

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicator57.3

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicator60.7

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicator66.7

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicator83.3

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSub-variable54.1

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicator43.3

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicator43.3

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicator54

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicator26

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicator83.3

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicator82

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSub-variable83.3

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator83.3

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicator83.3

3Citizen participationDimension56.6

3.1Participation practicesVariable56.6

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSub-variable54.3

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicator55.3

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicator50.7

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicator42

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicator83.3

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicator38

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicator56.7

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSub-variable58.4

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicator50.7

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicator76.7

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicator83.3

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicator42

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicator60.7

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicator49.3

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicator52

4Information disclosureDimension59

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable59

4.1.1Project identificationSub-variable46.1

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicator25.7

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicator78.3

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicator46.7

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicator88.3

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicator100

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicator24

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicator16.3

4.1.2Project preparationSub-variable22.8

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicator0

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicator2

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicator61.7

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicator52.7

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicator55

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSub-variable100

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator100

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicator100

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicator100

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicator100

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicator100

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicator100

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicator100

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicator100

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicator100

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicator100

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSub-variable26.7

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicator26.7

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicator26.7

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicator26.7

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicator26.7

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicator26.7

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicator26.7

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicator26.7

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicator26.7

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicator26.7

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicator26.7

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSub-variable86.8

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicator96.7

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicator67.3

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicator98.3

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicator82

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator100

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator100

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSub-variable26.3

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicator26.7

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicator25.3

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicator26.7

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicator26.7

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicator26.7

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicator26.7

Ukraine 2021: strong rules, weak public use

Ukraine enters the index at 62.2 of 100

Where the score comes from

How 30 procuring entities compare

Inspect one entity in depth

Compare this country with others