Europa · edición 2021

Ukraine 2021: normas sólidas, débil uso público

La dimensión más fuerte de Ukraine es entorno propicio; la más débil es participación ciudadana. El marco aún no se traduce de manera uniforme en la práctica.

93 indicadores 30 entidades de contratación 4 dimensiones

Puntuación ITI general

62.2/100

Promedio global: 44.2

Primera edición

La puntuación ITI

Ukraine entra al índice con 62.2 de 100

18 puntos por encima del promedio global. Entorno propicio sostiene la puntuación; participación ciudadana la frena.

La línea de base de 2021

62.22021

Ver como tabla

Edición	Puntuación ITI general
2021	62.2

Puntuación por dimensión, 2021

Entorno propicio70.2

Capacidades y procesos64.7

Participación ciudadana56.6

Publicación de datos59

Las marcas discontinuas muestran el promedio global.

Dentro de las cuatro dimensiones

De dónde viene la puntuación

Entorno propicio

70.2/100

Área más fuerte:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +3 más100

Área más débil:Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standard0

Explorar 3 subáreas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools70.2

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector56

1.1.3National digital information tools60

Capacidades y procesos

64.7/100

Área más fuerte:Connectivity to the internet · Follow-up mechanisms on information requests +3 más83.3

Área más débil:Use of digital information systems20

Explorar 5 subáreas

2.1Institutional capacities61.6

2.1.1Basic knowledge60.1

2.1.2Digital capacities63.1

2.2Institutional processes66.7

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information65.1

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information54.1

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure83.3

Participación ciudadana

56.6/100

Área más fuerte:Citizen attention office · Institutional response capacity83.3

Área más débil:Online form for consultation or requests38

Explorar 2 subáreas

3.1Participation practices56.6

3.1.1Participation opportunities54.3

3.1.2Use of information by citizens58.4

Publicación de datos

59/100

Área más fuerte:Project location · Procuring entity and contact details +11 más100

Área más débil:Environmental impact0

Explorar 6 subáreas

4.1Disclosure practices59

4.1.1Project identification46.1

4.1.2Project preparation22.8

4.1.3Execution contract procurement100

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement26.7

4.1.5Execution contract implementation86.8

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation26.3

Entidades de contratación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Las puntuaciones van de 83.3 a 18.2, con una mediana de 69.5.

2Líder80 a 100

18Fuerte60 a 79

5En desarrollo40 a 59

5Débil0 a 39

#
1	Road Service in Ivano-Frankivsk region	83.3	89.8	75.7	82.5
2	Department of Road Economy, Lviv Regional State Administration	83.1	84.7	87.9	78.7
3	Road Service in Lviv region	76.4	93.5	92.7	51.4
4	Road Service in Rivne region	76	86.2	92.7	56.8
5	Road Service in Khmelnytsky Region	75.8	89.7	88.2	55.9
6	Road Service in Donetsk region	74.2	90.6	84.6	53.3
7	Road Service in Poltava region	74.2	86.2	89.3	54.2
8	Road Service in Kharkiv region	73.5	83.7	84.6	57.7
9	Road Service in Vinnytsia region	73.4	90.6	84.6	51.3
10	Department of Territorial Development, Kherson Regional State Administration	72	72	52.3	84.3
11	Road Service in Kyiv region	70.9	86.5	81.9	50.3
12	Department of Development of Basic Industries, Donetsk Regional State Administration	70.7	75.1	50.1	79.8
13	Department of Education Tiachiv City Council Zakarpatska Oblast	70.3	65.6	65.1	77.8
14	State Enterprise "Financing of Infrastructure Projects"	70	76.2	47.4	78.6
15	Department of ‌regional‌ ‌development‌, Zhytomyr Regional State Administration	69.8	75.5	61.1	70.3
16	Road Service in Kherson region	69.5	87	82.8	45.9
17	State Enterprise "Local Road Service in Vinnytsa region"	67.6	82	74.7	50.5
18	Department of the Capital Construction Ivano-Frankivsk Regional State Administration	62.8	67.4	38.7	73.8
19	Department of Construction and Architecture, Rivne Regional State Administration	60.6	69.7	63.9	50.6
20	State Enterprise "Khmelnitskiy Local Road Service"	60.4	72.7	50.1	56.1
21	State Enterprise "Local Road Service", Odesa region	59.1	69.9	63.3	47.1
22	Department of Capital Construction and Roads, Chernivtsi Regional State Administration	58.1	69.4	57.2	48.8
23	Department of Infrastructure, Capital Construction and Road Operation, Chernivtsi Regional State Administration	51.6	62.9	40.7	48.5
24	State Institution "Local Roads of Kherson Region"	49.5	54.3	49.5	45.3
25	State Enterprise "Khmelnytsky Regional Service Of A Single Customer"	49.1	59.6	38.2	46.8
26	Department of Housing, Communal Services and Construction, Dnipropetrovsk Regional State Administration	31	0	0	77.5
27	Department of Regional Development, Housing and Communal Services, Volyn Regional State Administration	21.8	0	0	54.6
28	Department of Construction, Cherkasy Regional State Administration	20.2	0	0	50.5
29	Department of Regional Development, Kyiv Regional State Administration	18.8	0	0	47
30	State Enterprise "Agency of Local Roads" Kirovohrad region	18.2	0	0	45.5

Panel de la entidad

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Elija una entidad

Road Service in Ivano-Frankivsk region

Puesto #1 de 30 entidades

83.3Puntuación ITI de la entidad

Capacidades y procesos25.1 por encima del promedio89.8

Participación ciudadana19.1 por encima del promedio75.7

Divulgación de información23.5 por encima del promedio82.5

Las marcas indican el promedio de las 30 entidades.

Detalle completo El desglose completo de los 93 indicadores

National ITI ScorePuntuación62.2

1Enabling environmentDimensión70.2

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable70.2

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSubvariable100

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicador100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicador100

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicador100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicador100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSubvariable56

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicador100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicador60

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador60

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicador60

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador0

1.1.3National digital information toolsSubvariable60

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicador60

2Capacities and processesDimensión64.7

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable61.6

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSubvariable60.1

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicador77.3

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicador39.3

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicador24

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicador78.7

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicador81.3

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSubvariable63.1

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicador82.7

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicador83.3

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicador64.7

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicador49.3

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicador20

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicador30.7

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicador70

2.2Institutional processesVariable66.7

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSubvariable65.1

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicador57.3

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicador57.3

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicador60.7

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicador66.7

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicador83.3

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSubvariable54.1

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicador43.3

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicador43.3

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicador54

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicador26

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicador83.3

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicador82

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSubvariable83.3

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador83.3

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador83.3

3Citizen participationDimensión56.6

3.1Participation practicesVariable56.6

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSubvariable54.3

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicador55.3

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicador50.7

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicador42

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicador83.3

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicador38

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicador56.7

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSubvariable58.4

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicador50.7

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicador76.7

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicador83.3

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicador42

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicador60.7

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicador49.3

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicador52

4Information disclosureDimensión59

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable59

4.1.1Project identificationSubvariable46.1

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicador25.7

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicador78.3

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicador46.7

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicador88.3

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicador100

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicador24

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicador16.3

4.1.2Project preparationSubvariable22.8

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicador0

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicador2

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicador61.7

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicador52.7

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicador55

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSubvariable100

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador100

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicador100

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicador100

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicador100

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicador100

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicador100

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicador100

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicador100

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicador100

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicador100

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSubvariable26.7

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador26.7

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicador26.7

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicador26.7

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicador26.7

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicador26.7

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicador26.7

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicador26.7

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicador26.7

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicador26.7

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicador26.7

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSubvariable86.8

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicador96.7

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicador67.3

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicador98.3

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicador82

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador100

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador100

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSubvariable26.3

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicador26.7

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicador25.3

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicador26.7

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicador26.7

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador26.7

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador26.7

Ukraine 2021: normas sólidas, débil uso público

Ukraine entra al índice con 62.2 de 100

De dónde viene la puntuación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Compare este país con otros