Asia · edición 2021

Afghanistan 2021: normas sólidas, divulgación débil

La dimensión más fuerte de Afghanistan es entorno propicio; la más débil es publicación de datos. El marco aún no se traduce de manera uniforme en la práctica.

93 indicadores 24 entidades de contratación 4 dimensiones

Puntuación ITI general

50.1/100

Promedio global: 44.2

Primera edición

La puntuación ITI

Afghanistan entra al índice con 50.1 de 100

5.9 puntos por encima del promedio global. Entorno propicio sostiene la puntuación; publicación de datos la frena.

La línea de base de 2021

50.12021

Ver como tabla

Edición	Puntuación ITI general
2021	50.1

Puntuación por dimensión, 2021

Entorno propicio79.5

Capacidades y procesos59

Participación ciudadana61.3

Publicación de datos20.5

Las marcas discontinuas muestran el promedio global.

Dentro de las cuatro dimensiones

De dónde viene la puntuación

Entorno propicio

79.5/100

Área más fuerte:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +6 más100

Área más débil:Infrastructure data disclosure standard0

Explorar 3 subáreas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools79.5

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector80

1.1.3National digital information tools54

Capacidades y procesos

59/100

Área más fuerte:Information officer profile93.3

Área más débil:Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sector13.3

Explorar 5 subáreas

2.1Institutional capacities60.4

2.1.1Basic knowledge50.8

2.1.2Digital capacities70

2.2Institutional processes58

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information80.2

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information53

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure37.9

Participación ciudadana

61.3/100

Área más fuerte:Online form for consultation or requests84.2

Área más débil:Citizen participation in infrastructure projects42.5

Explorar 2 subáreas

3.1Participation practices61.3

3.1.1Participation opportunities58.5

3.1.2Use of information by citizens63.6

Publicación de datos

20.5/100

Área más fuerte:Procurement process · Contract type +1 más60.4

Área más débil:Project reference number · Project owner +28 más0

Explorar 6 subáreas

4.1Disclosure practices20.5

4.1.1Project identification0

4.1.2Project preparation0

4.1.3Execution contract procurement39.2

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement0

4.1.5Execution contract implementation58.3

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation0

Entidades de contratación

Cómo se comparan las 24 entidades de contratación

Las puntuaciones van de 62.9 a 16.5, con una mediana de 46.7.

0Líder80 a 100

2Fuerte60 a 79

13En desarrollo40 a 59

9Débil0 a 39

#
1	Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livstock (MAIL)	62.9	84.3	92.2	25.8
2	Ministry of Public Works (MoPW)	62.2	89.6	82	25.8
3	Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE)	56.1	70.6	67.1	36.6
4	Capital Region Development Authority (CRIDA)	56.1	74.9	61	36.6
5	Afghanistan Urban Water Supply and Swerage Corporation (SUWSS)	55.8	70.2	72.7	32.7
6	The Operation and Support Office of the President for National Development (OSOPND)	55.8	64.3	74.5	36.6
7	Ministry of Urban Development and Land (MUDL)	55.2	73.5	88.5	18.3
8	Civil Aviation Authority of Afghanistan (CAA)	55	68.9	65.1	36.6
9	Afghanistan Railways Authority (ARA)	51.9	65.1	58	36.6
10	Kabul Municipality	51.3	50.1	81.6	33.3
11	Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MoCIT)	50.2	60.4	57.8	36.6
12	Afghanistan Telecom Regulatory Authority (ATRA)	48.6	71.6	65	18.3
13	National Water Regulatory Affairs Authority	46.7	78.4	77	0
14	Da Afghanistan Breshna Sherikat	45.2	49.3	53.2	36.6
15	Ministry of Public Health (MoPH)	42.9	58.5	60.5	18.3
16	National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA)	39.5	53.2	24.9	36.6
17	Ministry of Education (MoE)	39.1	61.5	56.8	8.4
18	Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development (MRRD)	36.6	45	83.3	0
19	Ministry of Hajj and Religious Affairs (MoHRA)	36.5	48.6	48.8	18.3
20	Energy Services Regulation Authority (ESRA)	25.2	48.3	33.2	0
21	Mazar Municipality	24.7	37.3	46.8	0
22	Herat Municipality	23.9	35.3	46.1	0
23	Kandahar Municipality	22.3	29.6	47.8	0
24	Nangarhar Municipality	16.5	26.9	28.2	0

Panel de la entidad

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Elija una entidad

Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livstock (MAIL)

Puesto #1 de 24 entidades

62.9Puntuación ITI de la entidad

Capacidades y procesos25.3 por encima del promedio84.3

Participación ciudadana30.9 por encima del promedio92.2

Divulgación de información5.3 por encima del promedio25.8

Las marcas indican el promedio de las 24 entidades.

Detalle completo El desglose completo de los 93 indicadores

National ITI ScorePuntuación50.1

1Enabling environmentDimensión79.5

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable79.5

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSubvariable100

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicador100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicador100

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicador100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicador100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSubvariable80

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicador100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicador100

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador0

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicador100

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador100

1.1.3National digital information toolsSubvariable54

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicador40

2Capacities and processesDimensión59

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable60.4

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSubvariable50.8

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicador67.5

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicador37.5

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicador13.3

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicador69.2

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicador66.7

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSubvariable70

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicador82.5

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicador73.3

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicador86.7

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicador50

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicador43.3

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicador56.7

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicador65

2.2Institutional processesVariable58

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSubvariable80.2

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicador60

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicador85

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicador93.3

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicador92.5

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicador70

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSubvariable53

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicador40.8

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicador48.3

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicador70.8

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicador16.7

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicador58.3

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicador75

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSubvariable37.9

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador45.8

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador30

3Citizen participationDimensión61.3

3.1Participation practicesVariable61.3

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSubvariable58.5

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicador52.5

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicador53.3

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicador42.5

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicador77.5

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicador84.2

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicador60

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSubvariable63.6

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicador70.8

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicador74.2

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicador66.7

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicador50

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicador74.2

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicador53.3

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicador62.5

4Information disclosureDimensión20.5

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable20.5

4.1.1Project identificationSubvariable0

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicador0

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicador0

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicador0

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicador0

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicador0

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicador0

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicador0

4.1.2Project preparationSubvariable0

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicador0

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicador0

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicador0

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicador0

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicador0

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSubvariable39.2

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador36.3

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicador60.4

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicador0

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicador60.4

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicador60.4

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicador47.9

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicador50

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicador50

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicador26.3

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicador0

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSubvariable0

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador0

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicador0

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicador0

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicador0

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicador0

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicador0

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicador0

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicador0

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicador0

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicador0

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSubvariable58.3

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicador58.3

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicador58.3

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicador58.3

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicador58.3

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador58.3

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador58.3

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSubvariable0

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicador0

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicador0

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicador0

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicador0

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador0

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador0

Afghanistan 2021: normas sólidas, divulgación débil

Afghanistan entra al índice con 50.1 de 100

De dónde viene la puntuación

Cómo se comparan las 24 entidades de contratación

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Compare este país con otros