América Latina y el Caribe · edición 2021

Honduras 2021: normas sólidas, capacidad institucional débil

La dimensión más fuerte de Honduras es entorno propicio; la más débil es capacidades y procesos. El marco aún no se traduce de manera uniforme en la práctica.

93 indicadores 30 entidades de contratación 4 dimensiones

Puntuación ITI general

61.8/100

Promedio global: 44.2

Primera edición

La puntuación ITI

Honduras entra al índice con 61.8 de 100

17.6 puntos por encima del promedio global. Entorno propicio sostiene la puntuación; capacidades y procesos la frena.

La línea de base de 2021

61.82021

Ver como tabla

Edición	Puntuación ITI general
2021	61.8

Puntuación por dimensión, 2021

Entorno propicio79.1

Capacidades y procesos55.6

Participación ciudadana55.9

Publicación de datos59.7

Las marcas discontinuas muestran el promedio global.

Dentro de las cuatro dimensiones

De dónde viene la puntuación

Entorno propicio

79.1/100

Área más fuerte:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +3 más100

Área más débil:Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projects · Infrastructure data disclosure standard +3 más60

Explorar 3 subáreas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools79.1

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector68

1.1.3National digital information tools74

Capacidades y procesos

55.6/100

Área más fuerte:Knowledge about different data categories91.3

Área más débil:Level of disclosed infrastructure projects · Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projects3.3

Explorar 5 subáreas

2.1Institutional capacities69.4

2.1.1Basic knowledge67.5

2.1.2Digital capacities71.3

2.2Institutional processes46.5

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information74.7

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information55.2

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure3.3

Participación ciudadana

55.9/100

Área más fuerte:Institutional response capacity90.7

Área más débil:Improvements as a response to citizen participation19.3

Explorar 2 subáreas

3.1Participation practices55.9

3.1.1Participation opportunities68

3.1.2Use of information by citizens46.1

Publicación de datos

59.7/100

Área más fuerte:Project owner93.3

Área más débil:Land and settlement impact24

Explorar 6 subáreas

4.1Disclosure practices59.7

4.1.1Project identification71.2

4.1.2Project preparation38.1

4.1.3Execution contract procurement60.4

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement66.6

4.1.5Execution contract implementation58.5

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation66.7

Entidades de contratación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Las puntuaciones van de 99.3 a 25.9, con una mediana de 55.3.

3Líder80 a 100

9Fuerte60 a 79

14En desarrollo40 a 59

4Débil0 a 39

#
1	Ministry of Infrastrucutre and Public Services	99.3	98.3	100	99.8
2	Municipality of San Pedro Sula	82.4	79.5	80.8	86
3	Ministry of Development, Community, Water and Sanitation/ Honduran Social Investment Fund	81.9	79.6	78.6	86.1
4	Strategic Investment of Honduras	77.1	72.3	52.2	96.8
5	Municipality of Puerto Cortés	71.6	52.1	75.3	86.4
6	Municipality of El Progreso	70.1	59.3	57	87.7
7	Commission of the Control of Flood in the Sula Valley	69.7	51.6	68.2	86.5
8	National Port Company	67.8	43	55.7	97.1
9	Municipality of Central District	67.4	59.2	60	79.1
10	Honduran Institute of Social Security	65.4	65.4	36.6	83.3
11	Ministry of Education	62	65.7	69.5	54.1
12	National Program for Sustainable Rural Development	60.5	72	53.4	54.9
13	Municipality of Santa Rosa de Copan	58.6	49.4	67.3	61.3
14	Ministry of National Defense	56.1	55.2	35.4	69.9
15	Central Bank of Honduras	55.4	71.7	73.1	30
16	Judicial Branch	55.3	45.7	42	72
17	Ministry of Risk Management and National Contingencies	55	59	52.7	53.1
18	Municipality of Choloma	52.6	73	60.3	30
19	National Pedagogical University Francisco Morazán	51.1	42.1	41.1	65.2
20	Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion	50.4	56.2	61.6	38.5
21	National Company of Electric Energia	49.3	59.2	71.5	26.9
22	National Autonomous University of Honduras	48	45.3	45.4	51.9
23	National Direction of Parks and Recreation	47.9	39.4	55	51
24	National University of Agriculture	46.8	36.8	27.6	67.7
25	Municipality of San Lorenzo	41.5	66.5	66	4.3
26	Municipality of Choluteca	41.2	35.8	56.1	36.6
27	Municipality of Catacamas	37.9	48.6	76.6	4.3
28	National Emergency System -911	37.8	43	20.7	44
29	Ministry of Health	34	12.2	5	71.4
30	Ministry of Security	25.9	31.8	34.1	15.6

Panel de la entidad

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Elija una entidad

Ministry of Infrastrucutre and Public Services

Puesto #1 de 30 entidades

99.3Puntuación ITI de la entidad

Capacidades y procesos42.7 por encima del promedio98.3

Participación ciudadana44.1 por encima del promedio100

Divulgación de información40.1 por encima del promedio99.8

Las marcas indican el promedio de las 30 entidades.

Detalle completo El desglose completo de los 93 indicadores

National ITI ScorePuntuación61.8

1Enabling environmentDimensión79.1

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable79.1

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSubvariable100

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicador100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicador100

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicador100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicador100

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSubvariable68

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicador100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicador60

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador60

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicador60

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador60

1.1.3National digital information toolsSubvariable74

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicador80

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicador80

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicador60

2Capacities and processesDimensión55.6

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable69.4

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSubvariable67.5

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicador78.7

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicador41.3

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicador41.3

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicador84.7

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicador91.3

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSubvariable71.3

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicador88.7

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicador86.7

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicador74.7

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicador74.7

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicador62

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicador28.7

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicador48

2.2Institutional processesVariable46.5

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSubvariable74.7

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicador56

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicador67.3

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicador72.7

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicador90.7

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicador86.7

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSubvariable55.2

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicador47.3

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicador52.7

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicador64.7

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicador28

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicador77.3

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicador64.7

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSubvariable3.3

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador3.3

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador3.3

3Citizen participationDimensión55.9

3.1Participation practicesVariable55.9

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSubvariable68

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicador64.7

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicador82

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicador49.3

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicador79.3

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicador83.3

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicador71.3

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSubvariable46.1

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicador44.7

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicador56.7

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicador90.7

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicador61.3

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicador21.3

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicador40.7

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicador19.3

4Information disclosureDimensión59.7

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable59.7

4.1.1Project identificationSubvariable71.2

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicador75

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicador93.3

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicador55.7

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicador91.7

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicador83.3

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicador76.3

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicador48.7

4.1.2Project preparationSubvariable38.1

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicador26.3

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicador24

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicador63

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicador43.3

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicador80

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSubvariable60.4

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador78.7

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicador71.7

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicador65

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicador55

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicador55

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicador63.3

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicador60

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicador61.7

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicador49.3

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicador44.3

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSubvariable66.6

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador66.7

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicador66.7

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicador66.7

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicador66.7

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicador66.7

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicador66.7

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicador66.7

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicador66.7

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicador66

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicador66.7

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSubvariable58.5

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicador58.3

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicador55.3

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicador60

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicador60

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador60

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador59.3

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSubvariable66.7

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicador66.7

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicador66.7

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicador66.7

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicador66.7

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador66.7

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador66.7

Honduras 2021: normas sólidas, capacidad institucional débil

Honduras entra al índice con 61.8 de 100

De dónde viene la puntuación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Compare este país con otros