África · edición 2025

Ghana 2025: normas sólidas, capacidad institucional débil

La dimensión más fuerte de Ghana es entorno propicio; la más débil es capacidades y procesos. El marco aún no se traduce de manera uniforme en la práctica.

93 indicadores 30 entidades de contratación 4 dimensiones

Puntuación ITI general

35.8/100

Promedio global: 44.2

Primera edición

La puntuación ITI

Ghana entra al índice con 35.8 de 100

8.4 puntos por debajo del promedio global. Entorno propicio sostiene la puntuación; capacidades y procesos la frena.

La línea de base de 2025

35.82025

Ver como tabla

Edición	Puntuación ITI general
2025	35.8

Puntuación por dimensión, 2025

Entorno propicio60.9

Capacidades y procesos25.5

Participación ciudadana26.3

Publicación de datos34.1

Las marcas discontinuas muestran el promedio global.

Dentro de las cuatro dimensiones

De dónde viene la puntuación

Entorno propicio

60.9/100

Área más fuerte:Access-to-public information law · Right to request public information +3 más100

Área más débil:Infrastructure data disclosure standard · Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standard +1 más0

Explorar 3 subáreas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools60.9

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework90

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector52

1.1.3National digital information tools42

Capacidades y procesos

25.5/100

Área más fuerte:Knowledge about different data categories · Institutional website +1 más38

Área más débil:Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing information3.3

Explorar 5 subáreas

2.1Institutional capacities31.7

2.1.1Basic knowledge28.4

2.1.2Digital capacities34.9

2.2Institutional processes21.3

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information29.7

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information17.4

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure16

Participación ciudadana

26.3/100

Área más fuerte:Permanent and inclusive citizen participation · Citizen participation in infrastructure projects33.3

Área más débil:Evidence of joint projects16

Explorar 2 subáreas

3.1Participation practices26.3

3.1.1Participation opportunities29.1

3.1.2Use of information by citizens24.1

Publicación de datos

34.1/100

Área más fuerte:Project owner91.7

Área más débil:Environmental impact8

Explorar 6 subáreas

4.1Disclosure practices34.1

4.1.1Project identification76

4.1.2Project preparation27.3

4.1.3Execution contract procurement46.9

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement15.4

4.1.5Execution contract implementation22.8

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation19

Entidades de contratación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Las puntuaciones van de 66.1 a 6.2, con una mediana de 17.7.

0Líder80 a 100

2Fuerte60 a 79

9En desarrollo40 a 59

19Débil0 a 39

#
1	Shama District Assembly	66.1	55.1	74.6	70.4
2	Wassa East District Assembly	65.1	58.7	52.8	78.5
3	New Juaben South Municipal Assembly	59.3	43.3	71.4	65.7
4	Tarkwa Nsuaem Municipal Assembly	58.2	67.3	87.7	31.8
5	Ahanta West Municipal Assembly	56.9	52.3	30.3	77.6
6	Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolitan Assembly	50.6	52.2	74.9	34.1
7	Ministry of Energy and Green Transition	50.5	56	80.4	27
8	Effia-Kwesimintsim Municipal Assembly	50.1	56.8	82.3	24.2
9	Ministry of Roads and Highways	49	50.5	65.2	37.5
10	Nzema East Municipal Assembly	48.2	60.6	37.7	44
11	Mpohor District Assembly	45.4	75	55.5	13.2
12	Ghana Water Limited	30.8	46.4	44	8.9
13	Ministry of Transport	23.8	0	0	59.5
14	Wa Municipal Assembly	20.7	26.8	25.7	12.4
15	Ho Municipal Assembly	19.8	0	0	49.6
16	Ministry of Local Government, Chieftaincy and Religious Affairs	17.7	0	0	44.2
17	Sunyani Municipal Assembly	14.8	0	0	37
18	Ministry of Sports and Recreation	14.8	0	0	37
19	Ministry of Health	14.2	35.4	4.1	2
20	Ministry of Education	14.2	0	0	35.5
21	Ghana Civil Aviation Authority	13.9	0	0	34.8
22	Ghana National Petroleum Corporation	13.5	0	0	33.8
23	Ministry of Food and Agriculture	12.9	0	0	32.2
24	Department of Urban Roads	11.5	0	0	28.7
25	State Housing Company Limited	10.5	27.1	4.1	0
26	Techiman Municipal Assembly	10.5	0	0	26.1
27	Obuasi Municipal Assembly	9.6	0	0	24.1
28	Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority	9.2	0	0	23
29	Ministry of Communications, Digitalization and Innovations	6.5	0	0	16.3
30	Ministry of Works, Housing and Water Resources	6.2	0	0	15.6

Panel de la entidad

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Elija una entidad

Shama District Assembly

Puesto #1 de 30 entidades

66.1Puntuación ITI de la entidad

Capacidades y procesos29.6 por encima del promedio55.1

Participación ciudadana48.3 por encima del promedio74.6

Divulgación de información36.3 por encima del promedio70.4

Las marcas indican el promedio de las 30 entidades.

Detalle completo El desglose completo de los 93 indicadores

National ITI ScorePuntuación35.8

1Enabling environmentDimensión60.9

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable60.9

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSubvariable90

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicador100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicador100

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicador100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicador60

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSubvariable52

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicador100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicador100

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador0

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicador60

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador0

1.1.3National digital information toolsSubvariable42

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicador0

2Capacities and processesDimensión25.5

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable31.7

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSubvariable28.4

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicador32.7

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicador27.3

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicador15.3

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicador28.7

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicador38

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSubvariable34.9

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicador36

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicador33.3

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicador38

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicador31.3

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicador38

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicador31.3

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicador34

2.2Institutional processesVariable21.3

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSubvariable29.7

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicador24

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicador16

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicador35.3

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicador36

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicador37.3

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSubvariable17.4

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicador22

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicador26.7

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicador18.7

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicador3.3

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicador20.7

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicador8.7

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSubvariable16

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador18

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador14

3Citizen participationDimensión26.3

3.1Participation practicesVariable26.3

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSubvariable29.1

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicador28

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicador33.3

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicador33.3

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicador24

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicador18.7

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicador32

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSubvariable24.1

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicador29.3

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicador22

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicador21.3

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicador28.7

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicador20

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicador16

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicador24.7

4Information disclosureDimensión34.1

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable34.1

4.1.1Project identificationSubvariable76

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicador58.7

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicador91.7

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicador89.7

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicador83.3

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicador88.3

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicador70.3

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicador65.7

4.1.2Project preparationSubvariable27.3

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicador8

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicador10

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicador22.3

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicador61

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicador75

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSubvariable46.9

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador74.3

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicador60

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicador30

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicador61.7

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicador35

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicador53.3

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicador41.7

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicador36.7

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicador28.3

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicador47.7

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSubvariable15.4

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador28.7

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicador14

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicador11.7

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicador20

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicador13.3

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicador8.3

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicador8.3

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicador10.3

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicador18.7

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicador20.3

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSubvariable22.8

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicador31.7

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicador25

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicador31.7

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicador15.3

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador26.7

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador18.3

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSubvariable19

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicador20.3

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicador15.3

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicador23.3

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicador16.3

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador23.3

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador21.7

Ghana 2025: normas sólidas, capacidad institucional débil

Ghana entra al índice con 35.8 de 100

De dónde viene la puntuación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Compare este país con otros