África · edición 2025

Malawi 2025: normas sólidas, débil uso público

La dimensión más fuerte de Malawi es entorno propicio; la más débil es participación ciudadana. El marco aún no se traduce de manera uniforme en la práctica.

93 indicadores 30 entidades de contratación 4 dimensiones

Puntuación ITI general

25.4/100

Promedio global: 44.2

Primera edición

La puntuación ITI

Malawi entra al índice con 25.4 de 100

18.8 puntos por debajo del promedio global. Entorno propicio sostiene la puntuación; participación ciudadana la frena.

La línea de base de 2025

25.42025

Ver como tabla

Edición	Puntuación ITI general
2025	25.4

Puntuación por dimensión, 2025

Entorno propicio78.2

Capacidades y procesos6.9

Participación ciudadana3.7

Publicación de datos20.8

Las marcas discontinuas muestran el promedio global.

Dentro de las cuatro dimensiones

De dónde viene la puntuación

Entorno propicio

78.2/100

Área más fuerte:Access-to-public information law · Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandates +4 más100

Área más débil:Organisation guaranteeing the sanctions0

Explorar 3 subáreas

1.1Legal framework and digital tools78.2

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory framework70

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sector92

1.1.3National digital information tools68

Capacidades y procesos

6.9/100

Área más fuerte:Computer equipment · Connectivity to the internet14.7

Área más débil:Documentation of non-compliance and sanctions1.3

Explorar 5 subáreas

2.1Institutional capacities7.7

2.1.1Basic knowledge4.1

2.1.2Digital capacities11.3

2.2Institutional processes6.4

2.2.1Procedures to disclose information5.9

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose information4.4

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosure9.3

Participación ciudadana

3.7/100

Área más fuerte:Centralised citizen complaints10

Área más débil:Citizens use evidence · Improvements as a response to citizen participation0

Explorar 2 subáreas

3.1Participation practices3.7

3.1.1Participation opportunities5.6

3.1.2Use of information by citizens2.2

Publicación de datos

20.8/100

Área más fuerte:Project owner · Project name90

Área más débil:Variation to contract price · Reasons for price changes +4 más0

Explorar 6 subáreas

4.1Disclosure practices20.8

4.1.1Project identification78.9

4.1.2Project preparation32.4

4.1.3Execution contract procurement20

4.1.4Supervision contract procurement8.1

4.1.5Execution contract implementation3.1

4.1.6Supervision contract implementation0

Entidades de contratación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Las puntuaciones van de 42 a 2.4, con una mediana de 8.2.

0Líder80 a 100

0Fuerte60 a 79

1En desarrollo40 a 59

29Débil0 a 39

#
1	Northern Region Water Board	42	64.5	47.8	18.6
2	Lilongwe Water Board	38	39.1	15.9	50.8
3	Mzuzu City Council	36.6	53.8	33	23.8
4	Roads Authority	27.8	35.5	9.5	32.5
5	Ministry of Agriculture	17.1	14.8	5.4	26.5
6	ESCOM	15	0	0	37.4
7	Neno District Council	12.6	0	0	31.4
8	Blantyre Water Board	12	0	0	29.9
9	Shire Valley Transformation Project Phase 1	11.1	0	0	27.7
10	Malawi University of Basic and Applied Sciences	11.1	0	0	27.6
11	Ministry of Education	10.6	0	0	26.6
12	Ministry of Information and Digitization	10.6	0	0	26.5
13	Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natutal Resources	9.2	0	0	22.9
14	Central Region Water Board	8.8	0	0	22
15	Electricity Generation Company (Malawi) Limited (EGENCO)	8.7	0	0	21.8
16	Ministry of Water and Sanitation	8.2	0	0	20.5
17	Green Belt Authority	7.3	0	0	18.3
18	Malawi University of Science and Technology	6.9	0	0	17.3
19	Ministry of Lands	6.9	0	0	17.3
20	Ministry of Homeland Security	5.9	0	0	14.8
21	Directorate of Buildings, DoB	5.7	0	0	14.2
22	Ministry of Defence	5.6	0	0	14.1
23	Ministry of Transport and Public Works	5.5	0	0	13.8
24	Blantyre City Council	5.3	0	0	13.2
25	Lilongwe City Council	5.2	0	0	12.9
26	ZOMBA CITY COUNCIL	4.5	0	0	11.4
27	Machinga District Council	4.1	0	0	10.3
28	Malawi Institute of Management	3.4	0	0	8.4
29	Ministry of Health	2.8	0	0	7
30	Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Wildlife	2.4	0	0	6.1

Panel de la entidad

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Elija una entidad

Northern Region Water Board

Puesto #1 de 30 entidades

42Puntuación ITI de la entidad

Capacidades y procesos57.6 por encima del promedio64.5

Participación ciudadana44.1 por encima del promedio47.8

Divulgación de información2.2 por debajo del promedio18.6

Las marcas indican el promedio de las 30 entidades.

Detalle completo El desglose completo de los 93 indicadores

National ITI ScorePuntuación25.4

1Enabling environmentDimensión78.2

1.1Legal framework and digital toolsVariable78.2

1.1.1Access to public information regulatory frameworkSubvariable70

1.1.1.1Access-to-public information lawIndicador100

1.1.1.2Right to request public informationIndicador80

1.1.1.3Sanctions over non-compliance with access to public information mandatesIndicador100

1.1.1.4Organisation guaranteeing the sanctionsIndicador0

1.1.2Transparency standards in the public infrastructure sectorSubvariable92

1.1.2.1Proactive publication of information on public procurement processesIndicador100

1.1.2.2Proactive publication of information on public infrastructure projectsIndicador100

1.1.2.3Infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador100

1.1.2.4Infrastructure data disclosure standard proactively published as open dataIndicador100

1.1.2.5Organisation responsible for the infrastructure data disclosure standardIndicador60

1.1.3National digital information toolsSubvariable68

1.1.3.1Centralised digital information platformsIndicador60

1.1.3.2Easy access to information in digital information platformsIndicador80

1.1.3.3Infrastructure projects geographic information system (GIS) platformIndicador60

2Capacities and processesDimensión6.9

2.1Institutional capacitiesVariable7.7

2.1.1Basic knowledgeSubvariable4.1

2.1.1.1Knowledge about the access-to-information lawIndicador4

2.1.1.2Knowledge about transparency initiatives in the infrastructure sectorIndicador5.3

2.1.1.3Knowledge about the transparency data standard in the infrastructure sectorIndicador2

2.1.1.4Knowledge about sanctions due to non-compliance on the access-to-public-information lawIndicador3.3

2.1.1.5Knowledge about different data categoriesIndicador6

2.1.2Digital capacitiesSubvariable11.3

2.1.2.1Computer equipmentIndicador14.7

2.1.2.2Connectivity to the internetIndicador14.7

2.1.2.3Institutional websiteIndicador11.3

2.1.2.4Information systems for infrastructure projectsIndicador3.3

2.1.2.5Use of digital information systemsIndicador12.7

2.1.2.6Infrastructure open data publicationIndicador6.7

2.1.2.7Visualisations based on infrastructure projects dataIndicador9.3

2.2Institutional processesVariable6.4

2.2.1Procedures to disclose informationSubvariable5.9

2.2.1.1Procedures for the publication of informationIndicador3.3

2.2.1.2Responsibilities for disclosureIndicador5.3

2.2.1.3Information officer profileIndicador5.3

2.2.1.4Information officerIndicador8.7

2.2.1.5Follow-up mechanisms on information requestsIndicador6.7

2.2.2Enablers and barriers to disclose informationSubvariable4.4

2.2.2.1Internal policy for information publicationIndicador3.3

2.2.2.2Disclosure training programmeIndicador2

2.2.2.3Identification of limitations for publishing informationIndicador6

2.2.2.4Plan to mitigate limitations for publishing informationIndicador2.7

2.2.2.5Bureaucratic barriers to publish informationIndicador12

2.2.2.6Documentation of non-compliance and sanctionsIndicador1.3

2.2.3Control over infrastructure projects disclosureSubvariable9.3

2.2.3.1Level of disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador10.7

2.2.3.2Level of investment represented by disclosed infrastructure projectsIndicador8

3Citizen participationDimensión3.7

3.1Participation practicesVariable3.7

3.1.1Participation opportunitiesSubvariable5.6

3.1.1.1Institutionalised citizen participationIndicador2

3.1.1.2Permanent and inclusive citizen participationIndicador4.7

3.1.1.3Citizen participation in infrastructure projectsIndicador7.3

3.1.1.4Citizen attention officeIndicador5.3

3.1.1.5Online form for consultation or requestsIndicador3.3

3.1.1.6Awareness of participation opportunitiesIndicador8.7

3.1.2Use of information by citizensSubvariable2.2

3.1.2.1Centralised citizen complaintsIndicador10

3.3.2.2Requests and responses of access to informationIndicador2

3.3.2.3Institutional response capacityIndicador2.7

3.3.2.4Institutional use evidenceIndicador2

3.3.2.5Citizens use evidenceIndicador0

3.3.2.6Evidence of joint projectsIndicador2

3.3.2.7Improvements as a response to citizen participationIndicador0

4Information disclosureDimensión20.8

4.1Disclosure practicesVariable20.8

4.1.1Project identificationSubvariable78.9

4.1.1.1Project reference numberIndicador42.3

4.1.1.2Project ownerIndicador90

4.1.1.3Sector and sub-sectorIndicador57.3

4.1.1.4Project nameIndicador90

4.1.1.5Project locationIndicador88.7

4.1.1.6Project descriptionIndicador84

4.1.1.7PurposeIndicador79.7

4.1.2Project preparationSubvariable32.4

4.1.2.1Environmental impactIndicador15

4.1.2.2Land and settlement impactIndicador15

4.1.2.3Contact detailsIndicador24.3

4.1.2.4Project budget and date of approvalIndicador75.3

4.1.2.5Funding sourcesIndicador59.3

4.1.3Execution contract procurementSubvariable20

4.1.3.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador51.3

4.1.3.2Procurement processIndicador10

4.1.3.3Number of firms biddingIndicador3.3

4.1.3.4Contract typeIndicador18.3

4.1.3.5Contract titleIndicador17.7

4.1.3.6Contract priceIndicador12.7

4.1.3.7Contract start dateIndicador24

4.1.3.8Contract durationIndicador28.7

4.1.3.9Contractor(s)Indicador13.7

4.1.3.10Contract scope of workIndicador20.3

4.1.4Supervision contract procurementSubvariable8.1

4.1.4.1Procuring entity and contact detailsIndicador13.3

4.1.4.2Procurement processIndicador3.3

4.1.4.3Number of firms/individuals biddingIndicador1.7

4.1.4.4Contract typeIndicador13.3

4.1.4.5Contract titleIndicador10

4.1.4.6Contract priceIndicador8.3

4.1.4.7Contract start dateIndicador6.7

4.1.4.8Contract durationIndicador8.3

4.1.4.9Contract firm/individualIndicador7

4.1.4.10Contract scope of workIndicador9.3

4.1.5Execution contract implementationSubvariable3.1

4.1.5.1Variation to contract priceIndicador2

4.1.5.2Reasons for price changesIndicador2

4.1.5.3Variation to contract durationIndicador5.3

4.1.5.4Reasons for contract duration changesIndicador4.3

4.1.5.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador2.7

4.1.5.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador2.7

4.1.6Supervision contract implementationSubvariable0

4.1.6.1Variation to contract priceIndicador0

4.1.6.2Reasons for price changesIndicador0

4.1.6.3Variation to contract durationIndicador0

4.1.6.4Reasons for duration changesIndicador0

4.1.6.5Variation to contract scopeIndicador0

4.1.6.6Reasons for scope changesIndicador0

Malawi 2025: normas sólidas, débil uso público

Malawi entra al índice con 25.4 de 100

De dónde viene la puntuación

Cómo se comparan las 30 entidades de contratación

Examine una entidad en profundidad

Compare este país con otros